| JUNK LAW PAGE This page discuss how "Unpublished Opinions" are used to circumvent and violate clearly established law and are offensive to the "rule of law". There are some opinions on this page which can only be described as "junk law". |
HOME
PAGE A comprehensive look at the misconduct of Judge Graham and how the Eleventh Circuit conspires to conceal this misconduct. |
| TRICKERY PAGE Tricks Used by the Eleventh Circuit to Undermine Appeal Rights |
JUDGE EDMONDSON MAKES
MOCKERY OF JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT COMPLAINTS |
| JUDGE
GRAHAM'S
LAWSUIT Judge Graham was sued, however the Eleventh Circuit grants him immunity without discussing the legality of what Judge Graham did. |
ABUSE OF INHERENT
AUTHORITY BY JUDGE DONALD L. GRAHAM |
| Judge Graham's Blog A quick summary of Judge Donald L. Graham's Lawless and Arrogant Behavior |
Undermining
The Right of Appeal Describes how the Eleventh Circuit evades issues on appeal in order to get the desired outcome. The Eleventh Circuit is quite adept at this tactic. |
| No
Right to Have Motion Decided. The Eleventh Circuit has used
another "unpublished opinion" to assert that a litigant does not have a
right to have his motion decided. |
Manufacturing
and Concocting a Criminal. Judge Graham concocted a "filing
injunction" that is clearly void and illegal and used it as the basis
for criminal contempt conviction. However, the Eleventh Circuit
has refused to allow appellate review of this "filing injunction". |
The Goverment and Assistant U.S. Attorney, Robert Waters, use the Power of the Government to stop free speech attacks on Judge Donald L. Graham's Record.
|
After Assistant U. S. Attorney Robert Waters, realized a campaign to publish Judge Donald L. Graham's record was underway he tried to crush the campaign. The first thing that the government does is suggest that Marcellus Mason is dangerous. This is the stated purpose for trying to stop the mass emailing campaign. The government never says what Mason did that is dangerous. The following excerpt is located at: http://geocities.com/mcneilmason/secret/02-14020/MotionToAmend.pdf . Title 18, United States Code, Section 3142
allows a judicial officer to release a person pending trial if that
person does not pose a danger to other persons or the community. This
section also allows the judicial officer to impose conditions of
release to insure that a defendant does not pose a danger to others or
does not violate any of the provisions of §3142 (c).
The Government then goes on state its real purpose or hideen agenda. The United States seeks to modify that bond and set special conditions... In this case, Defendant has engaged in repeated instances of mass emailings to members of the legal community throughout the United States. These entails are derogatory to the Court and unsolicited by the recipients. Further, Defendant has communicated with, among others, Maria Sorolis, a Florida attorney who was involved in the original civil lawsuit which gave rise to the contempt conviction of which Defendant has been convicted and awaits sentencing. As such, Defendant’s communications with Ms. Sorolis are unsolicited, unwanted, and offensive. Moreover, Ms. Sorolis may be a witness for the government at Defendant’s sentencing, and thus, would be a violation of the conditions set out in §3 142 (c) (B) (u), (see Exhibit 1). More importantly, Defendant has entailed, by his own admissions, hundreds of thousands of communications to lawyers, judges, and his school professors, all demeaning and ridiculing the Court. Specifically, Judge Donald Graham, the de facto victim in Defendant’s contempt case (see Exhibits 2 and 3). Defendant is engaging in a systemic campaign of harassment and ridicule targeting a federal district court judge, while free on bond pending sentencing for contempt of court. As this behavior shows, Defendant has not refrained from the type of conduct that caused his contempt conviction, and clearly has violated and ignored the spirit, if not the letter, of his release under §3142. Wherefore, the United States of America respectfully requests this Court modify defendant’s conditions of release to insure the harassing and disrespectful behavior through use of the Internet cease or in the alternative, that Defendant be detained pending sentencing, as provided in Title 18, United States Code, Section 3143 (a) .
|
